ISSN: 1697-090X


Indice del volumen
Volume index

Comité Editorial
Editorial Board

Comité Científico
Scientific Committee

Normas para los autores
Instruction to Authors

Derechos de autor Copyright


    Rev Electron Biomed / Electron J Biomed 2012;3:3-6.



    Carlos G. Musso MD. PhD., Hector Rivera MD., Manuel Vilas MD.

    Nephrology Division. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.
    Buenos Aires. Argentina

    carlos.musso @

    Version española

    When the conservative measures for the treatment of renal failure secondary to heart failure (pre-renal cardiogenic renal failure) are not enough to avoid alterations in the internal millieu and/or water and salt overload, it is necessary to use a renal replacement therapy (artificial kidney), which could be extracorporeal (hemodialysis - hemofiltration) or intracorporeal (peritoneal dialysis)1-2.

    The need to use renal replacement in patients who suffer from heart failure can arise when some of the following clinical situations take place:

    A) Heart failure decompensation, with clear water and salt overload and low systolic volume, which brings about resistance to diuretics therapy when these cannot be filtrated and thus they do not reach their action site (tubular lumen). The removal of such water and salt overload by means of dialytic ultrafiltration (extracorporeal or peritoneal) or by hemofiltration associated to a negative balance of water and salt, leads to an improvement in heart contractility (Starling law), its systolic volume, and therefore in renal perfusion and diuretics renal response3-4.

    Frequently, it occurs that after a few sessions of ultrafiltration, they stop being necessary due to that the recovered renal response to the diuretics is enough to obtain the required negative balance of water and salt. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that there are several additional advantages to the removal of fluid by ultrafiltration respect to that removed by diuresis: on one hand, while the ultrafiltrated fluid is isotonic, the urinated fluid is hypotonic, so the sodium removal obtained by ultrafiltration is higher than that obtained by diuresis5-6.

    On the other hand, the removal by ultrafiltration (isotonic) results in a more sustained decrease of intravascular hydrostatic pressure than that induced by diuresis, which produces a much lower activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis than that obtained by diuretics4-6.

    B) Heart decompensated disease with a marked systolic volume reduction, severe pre-renal renal failure which leads to oliguria, water and salt overload, uremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and/or metabolic acidosis. The treatment for these complications is the combination of dialysis and ultrafiltration (using haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) or the indication of haemodiafiltration, depending if the patient is haemodinamically stable or not, respectively6-7.

    For this reason, in cases of acute renal failure secondary to cardiogenic shock it is preferred to use continuous renal replacement therapies to control its volume overload and correct its electrolytic and acid-base alterations.

    C) Heart failure associated to advanced chronic renal failure (stage IV or V), is a clinical situation where failure in both organs combined causes each of them to decompensate more easily. In fact, a patient suffering from chronic renal failure and who also suffers heart disease can be necessary to enter into a chronic dialysis program (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) earlier than usual (glomerular filtration < 20 and > 10 ml/min/1.73 m2) since there is a bad handling of water and salt balance (frequent episodes of acute lung congestion) despite being adequately treated (hyposodic diet, diuretics, spironolactone, beta blockers, convertase inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers).

    If the peritoneal dialysis treatment is indicated, it can be enough to do a more reduced number of dialytic exchanges (cycles) respect to those patients who start dialysis due to end-stage renal disease: this type of peritoneal dialysis, which progressively increases the amount of exchanges is called incremental dialysis6-10.

    CONCLUSION Renal replacement therapies help to treat decompensated heart failure associated or not to renal insufficiency.


      1.- Joannidis M. Indications for renal replacement therapy in the critically ill. In Ronco C, Bellomo R, Kellum J. (Eds.) Critical Care Nephrology.Philadelphia. Saunders. 2009: 1128-1130.

      2.- Belziti C. Comorbilidades en la insuficiencia cardíaca II: insuficiencia renal. En Belziti C, Vulcano N (Eds.). Insuficiencia cardíaca. Respuestas sobre casos clínicos. Buenos Aires. Intermédica.2010: 59-66.

      3.- Musso CG, Torres Torres G. Artificial kidney physiology. Electron J Biomed. 2007; 3: 8-12.

      4.- Bart B, Boyle A, Bank A, Anand I, Olivari M, Kraemer M, Mackedanz S, Sobotka P, Schollmeyer M, Goldsmith S. Ultrafiltration Versus Usual Care for Hospitalized Patients With Heart FailureThe Relief for Acutely Fluid-Overloaded Patients With Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure (RAPID-CHF) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(11):2043-2046.

      5) Costanzo M, Guglin M, Saltzberg M, Jessup M, Bart B, Teerlink J, Jaski B, Fang J, Feller E, Haas G, Anderson A, Schollmeyer M, Sobotka M. Ultrafiltration Versus Intravenous Diuretics for Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (UNLOAD) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(6):675-683.

      6) Dormans T, Huige R, Gerlag P. Chronic intermittent haemofiltration and haemodialysis in end stage chronic heart failure with oedema refractory to high dose furosemide. Heart. 1996; 75: 349-351.

      7) Bart B, Goldsmith S, Lee K, Redfield M, Felker G, O'Connor C, Chen H, Rouleau J, Givertz M, Semigran M, Mann D, Deswal A, Bull D, Lewinter M, Braunwald E. Cardiorenal rescue study in acute decompensated heart failure: rationale and design of CARRESS-HF, for the Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. J Card Fail. 2012;18(3):176-182.

      8) Kirishnan A, Oreopoulos D. Peritoneal dialysis in congestive heart failure. Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis. 2007;23:82-89.

      9) Bertoli S, Ciurlino D, Maccario M, Martino S, Bigatti G, Traversi L, Procaccio M, Buzzi L. Home peritoneal ultrafiltration in patients with severe congestive heart failure without end-stage renal disease. Adv Perit Dial. 2005;21:123-27.

      10) Burkart J, Bargman J. Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis, including fluid balance. In Gokal R, Khanna R, Krediet R, Nolph K. (Eds.). Textbook of peritoneal dialysis. New York. Springer. 2009: 469-503.

    Carlos G. Musso
    Nephrology Division.
    Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.
    Buenos Aires. Argentina
    Mail:carlos.musso @